ArchiveTag Cloudacquisitions antitrust ask browsers canonical christmas google international keywords language marketing microsoft online advertising pagerank personalised search redirects research search spam yahoo! SubscribeIf you would like to be alerted when someone posts to the blog please enter your email address below. RSS 2.0 Feed |
How old are Toolbar PageRank values?Posted on 5th June 2009 at 4:30 pm by Ian Macfarlane
Google only updates the PageRank values seen in its toolbar every few months, but calculates new values internally much more frequently. Please note: The web pages used in this article are used for reference only. LBi does not endorse any of the pages linked to from this article. Google updates the PageRank values shown in the Google Toolbar every 3-4 months (and sometimes more often). However, Google also calculates the PageRank values that it uses internally much more frequently (at least daily). The PageRank shown in the Google Toolbar is therefore a "snapshot" of values at some point in time. A commonly asked question when Google updates the PageRank values displayed within its toolbar is "How old are these new PageRank values?" - are they fresh, up-to-date values which have just been calculated, or are they several months old? Although, in general, we would recommend not obsessing about Google's green bar too much, knowing the answer to this question has several implications - for example, if you know how recent the values are, you can determine whether any recent linkbuilding activity is being accounted for within the new PageRank values. MethodologyThe methodology for this experiment is fairly simple - to know how old the values are, we need to establish what what the length of time was between pages last being given PageRank and the PageRank update. Therefore, we need to find:
Oldest mentions of PageRank updateFor the purposes of finding the earliest possible date that a PageRank update was mentioned, we have looked at a number of different SEO discussion sites in order to find the earliest mention by a member of their community. We'll convert all times into British Summer Time (GMT+1) for comparison.
There are lots of other sites, but we've picked a selection of the earliest posts. The earliest one seems to be the WebmasterWorld thread, with a time of 23:12 BST on May 27th. Newest articles with PageRankThe next step requires finding the most recent page possible which has a PageRank value. Please note that this does not mean the most recent page with a PageRank of 1 or more - a PageRank value of "zero" also constitutes a page having a PageRank value assigned to it. A PageRank of zero simply means that, on the sliding scale used by Google, the page falls into the set of pages with the lowest PageRank values. This is different from having no PageRank value at all. The best place to look for recent pages which may have PageRank is to look for a high-PageRank, high-traffic site which is frequently updated and which uses web feeds to ensure that new pages are rapidly indexed. News sites are ideal for this. We've picked The Guardian because the website includes detailed date information, including both the original publication date and the date that the articles were last updated, whereas many other online newspapers don't include the original article publication dates. Here are a few of the most recent articles found, along with their dates. These articles are all PageRank zero.
Hang on... what's this?
|
| « Google Toolbar PageRank update 27th May | The Search engine that wasn't » |
Posted on 15th June 2009 at 12:09 pm by Feydakin
Appearances can be deceiving.. Especially when dealing with Google..
You left out the option that the toolbar pagerank of 0 may simply be an indicator that the page has been indexed but not yet assigned a toolbar PR yet.. Now, if those new pages had been assigned a toolbar PR of 1 or 2 or 5, you might have a case for the green bar being current.. But, I would expect that if you checked pages other than forums, which are terrible at distributing PR internally, you would see that those pages will go from 0 to some green number on the next update indicating that there may be a lag in there somewhere..
All that said, even though I think that there may be some flaws in your methodology and theory, I'm thrilled to see someone actually experimenting on things rather than pontificating mere guesswork..